Plasticity and vagueness

FDR with his advisers Louis Howe and James Farley (1932)

FDR with his advisers Louis Howe and James Farley (1932)

The fifth proposition represents, I would say the most high-level, over-arching conclusion to my thesis, the idea that FDR through his rhetoric, autofabricated a public image that is profoundly plastic. I don’t use plastic here to mean “fake”, but flexible – although the creation of a flexible public image does call for a rhetorically astute approach to authenticity that allows audiences to believe it is artless, but is not itself naïve.

Franklin Roosevelt often presented himself as informal, and open about his thoughts, strategies, and personal experiences, while being very selective about the precise details of what he was open about (for instance, with regard to his private life, his dog Fala showed up regularly in relative details, but not his experience of being disabled). A famous example of the simultaneous frankness and deviousness of his rhetoric is this quotation about his role in the American war effort:

You know I am a juggler, and I never let my right hand know what my left hand does. I may have one policy for Europe and one diametrically opposite for North and South America. I may be entirely inconsistent, and furthermore I am perfectly willing to mislead and tell untruths if it will help win the war.

“I am a juggler, and I never let my right hand know what my left hand does,” reminds of the liar paradox (“This sentence is false.”) because Roosevelt is actually compellingly honest about his own dissimulation. “You know” in the full quotation enhances this effect, because it makes the addressee complicit in the performance of enchanting deception. Thus Roosevelt assertively licenses himself to “mislead and tell untruths,” a claim that would perhaps only have been acceptable in 1942, in the context of the war. However, this quote is remembered, explicitly through Warren Kimball’s book The Juggler, and implicitly also in the film Hyde Park on Hudson, as speaking to an admirable quality. Many of his best remembered words have this same vagueness – “the only things we have to fear is fear itself” is a case in point – and therefore allow for re-appropriation in a wide range of contexts. Or as the fifth proposition has it:

“Franklin Roosevelt remains relevant to the present and future because he positioned himself as a, not limitless but malleable, space into which needs, desires, ideologies, even aversions, can be projected.”

Over Sara Polak

Blog about my research: The World We Live In Today Is FDR's World
Dit bericht is geplaatst in Geen categorie. Bookmark de permalink.

2 reacties op Plasticity and vagueness

  1. Margaret S. Voorhees schreef:

    Sara, I think what you are writing is true and it was probably the personality he
    suspected could be accepted by enough of the American public for him to be
    elected. As a life-long Democrat and democrat, and one citizen I am grateful
    to the many things he was able to do. Part of that was because of the people
    around him including Frances Perkins who insisted on many positive actions
    which benefited working people. Many of these were probably not what a
    Republican president would have opted for. Mgt.Voorhees

  2. Sara Polak schreef:

    Dear Margaret Voorhees,
    I just realized I never asked you if you’d be interested reading the book as a whole. If so, would be more than happy to send you a copy – you’ve been such a faithful follower of this blog! Do email me your postal address so I can send you the book.
    All best wishes, Sara

Laat een reactie achter bij Sara Polak Reactie annuleren

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Verplichte velden zijn gemarkeerd met *